One forensic pass over an entire insurance claim record. Contradictions between what was said and what was done. Unexplained delays. Shifting positions. Withheld documents. Every finding anchored to the exact source page — receipts, not faith.
“Coverage for the loss has been confirmed and your file is proceeding to appraisal.”
“Please be advised that coverage was never confirmed and remains under investigation.”
General-purpose legal AI drafts documents. Fault Audit cross-examines the record. Purpose-built for one job — forensic analysis of insurance claim files — and engineered to do that one job at a depth a general tool structurally cannot.
This is not a demo reel. The engine has run end-to-end on live Ontario claim files, with draft litigation artifacts delivered to counsel.
Full forensic runs over title-defect claim records — denial reasoning traced against the insurer's own file, document by document, with a chronological evidence ledger and withheld-documents schedule delivered as counsel-ready drafts.
Deep analysis of auto and accident-benefits claim files — position shifts, unexplained silence windows, and correspondence-log gaps surfaced from the record itself, each anchored to its source page.
ONE SHARED ENGINE · INSULATED ARCHITECTURE · EXTENDS TO ANY INSURANCE LINE
Compliance platforms defend the institution. Fault Audit arms the counsel across the table.
Every finding cites the exact source page it came from. If the engine cannot anchor a claim to the record, it says nothing at all.
The engine would rather emit no finding than manufacture one. Quantum and anything unverifiable fail closed to human review.
Every output faces a simulated opposing-counsel attack before it ships. What reaches counsel has already survived the cross.